There are 5 main methods of sampling air quality. Each method has advantages and disadvantages depending what is required of the monitoring survey.
Monitoring stations (or sites) are usually classified according to which environment they are located in. This allows more meaningful evaluation of the data and allows comparison between sites of a similar type. The monitoring site classifications used by District Councils for Local Air Quality Management purposes, are described below. (This is taken from the Local Air Quality Management Technical Guidance document, LAQM.TG(16)). These site descriptions typically reflect the general surroundings (e.g. urban or rural), and/or indicate important sources of pollution (e.g. ‘roadside’ or ‘industrial’).
Location | Description |
Urban Centre |
An urban location representative of typical population exposure in towns or city centres e.g. pedestrian precincts and shopping areas. |
Urban Background |
An urban location distanced from sources and therefore broadly representative of city-wide background conditions e.g. urban residential areas. |
Suburban |
A location type situated in a residential area on the outskirts of a town or city. |
Roadside |
A site sampling between one to five metres of the kerb of a busy road (distance can be up to 10m from the kerb). |
Kerbside |
A site sampling within 1 m of the kerb of a busy road. |
Industrial |
An area where industrial sources make an important contribution to the total pollution burden. |
Rural |
An open countryside location, in an area of low population distanced as far as possible from roads, populated and industrial areas. |
Other |
Any special source-orientated or location category covering monitoring undertaken in relation to specific emission sources such as power stations, car parks or tunnels. |
Air quality monitoring is the principle scientific method for determining the concentration or level of a particular pollutant present in the ambient air at a specific point in time.
Kent and Medway local authorities as well as national agencies, scientific institutions and private companies undertake air quality monitoring in accordance with an appropriate quality assurance and control programme, as set out in government guidance, which aims:
Irrespective of the technique, monitoring can provide data, which, given that it is sufficiently reliable, can be used with appropriate analysis and interpretation for the following purposes:
Therefore, to ensure the above objectives can be achieved a robust quality assurance quality control programme must be followed. QA/QC programmes include an established schedule of regular site calibrations, site service and audits, verification and ratification of all measured data and documentation of all procedures.
After applying the calibration factor measured data are visually screened by air quality experts to see if it contains spurious and unusual measurements, this is how equipment faults or exceptionally high pollution are detected. Any suspicious data is marked for further detailed analysis. This process is known as data verification. The final process is data ratification which is a more thorough check at 3 to 6 monthly interval to ensure data remains reliable and consistent.